Vigorish (Juice)
Vigorish (Juice)
The hidden tax in every bet and why understanding it is essential for long-term profitability
📘 Definition
Vigorish, often shortened to “vig” and also called “juice”, is the commission that sportsbooks charge bettors for taking wagers. It represents the built-in edge that ensures bookmakers profit regardless of outcomes if betting volume is balanced.
In practice, vigorish is the reason standard spread and total lines are priced at -110 instead of even-money. That extra 10 cents per dollar wagered is the bookmaker’s margin. Without vig, sports betting would operate at zero-sum odds where bettors who win 50% of the time break even. With vig, bettors must win at least 52.38% of wagers at -110 odds to avoid losses.
🧮 Structure
The mechanics of vigorish can be explained through implied probabilities:
-
Standard Line (-110 / -110)
-
Each side implies a win probability of 52.38%.
-
Combined = 104.76%, exceeding 100% (the fair market).
-
The extra 4.76% is the vig.
-
-
No-Vig Line
-
If the true odds were even, both sides would be +100 (50% each).
-
-
Variable Vig
-
Some markets charge higher vig: props (-115 / -115) or niche sports (-120 / -120).
-
Low-vig promotions: -105 pricing or “reduced juice” books.
-
-
House Edge Calculation
-
Formula: House Edge = (Sum of Implied Probabilities – 100%).
-
🎯 In Practice
Sportsbooks rely on vig as their business model:
-
NFL Example: Chiefs -3 (-110) vs Jets +3 (-110).
-
If book takes $110 on both sides, it collects $220.
-
Winner paid $210 ($110 stake + $100 profit).
-
Book keeps $10 risk-free.
-
-
NBA Example: Over 215.5 (-110) vs Under 215.5 (-110).
-
Same math applies—house collects vig regardless of outcome if bets are balanced.
-
-
Prop Bets:
-
Books often shade juice to -115 / -115 or worse, increasing edge.
-
🔢 Example Bet
Bettor places $550 on Packers -6.5 at -110:
-
Win: Profit = $500, payout $1,050.
-
Lose: Forfeit $550.
Break-even rate = 52.38%.
If bettor wagers 100 games at -110 and goes 52–48, they still lose money due to vig.
💸 Pros and Cons
| ✅ Advantages | ❌ Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Ensures sportsbooks stay in business | Forces bettors to exceed 52.38% win rate |
| Encourages fair markets by balancing action | Higher vig in props drains bankrolls faster |
| Clear, transparent cost in regulated books | Recreational bettors underestimate its impact |
| Reduced juice offers better value | Hidden vig in fractional odds confuses newcomers |
💡 Strategy Tips
-
Line Shop
-
Always compare multiple sportsbooks. Even small vig differences add up long term.
-
-
Target Reduced Juice
-
Some books offer -105 spreads, lowering break-even to 51.22%.
-
-
Avoid High-Vig Props
-
Don’t overbet -120 / -120 markets unless confident in big edge.
-
-
Calculate No-Vig Line
-
Remove bookmaker margin to see true probability. Tools and formulas can help.
-
-
Focus on ROI, Not Win Rate
-
A 53% win rate may be profitable at -105, but losing at -115.
-
-
Exploit Market Timing
-
Early sharp bets move lines, sometimes reducing vig opportunities.
-
📊 Best Use Cases
-
NFL Spreads/Totals: Classic -110 markets where vig most visible.
-
NBA & NHL Moneylines: Odds splits reveal hidden juice.
-
MLB Run Lines: Heavily juiced, requiring line shopping.
-
Soccer Props: High vig in cards, corners, or niche leagues—ripe for caution.
⚠️ Common Mistakes
-
Ignoring vig completely: Thinking 50% win rate = break even.
-
Betting -120 lines casually: Each step up in vig raises break-even rate.
-
Falling for promos: Boosted odds often hide vig elsewhere.
-
Not tracking CLV: Beating the closing line consistently offsets vig disadvantage.
-
Chasing parlays: Vig multiplies across legs, creating massive house edge.
📌 Summary
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it is | Bookmaker’s commission built into odds, also called juice |
| Why it matters | Raises break-even win rate above 50%, ensuring house edge |
| Standard rate | -110 both sides (4.76% margin) |
| Risks | Higher vig in props and niche sports drain bankrolls faster |
| Best practice | Shop lines, target reduced juice, avoid high-vig props |